flexibeast

Again that is the whole sticy situation of putting our ouwn definitions on other people's identities.

At the very least they would be non-monogamous

In reality would they call themselves poly? or single?

What if they genuinely had affection/care for some of their "no strings" sexual encouters? That is a big grey area

Are they only having sex once withthier casual partners, or is it ongoing casual?

I think it is a complicated area to be wanting to impose simple solutions.